Download the guide to see how leading enterprises navigate the build vs. buy decision when scaling compliance.
Learn how to evaluate the true cost of building in-house, uncover hidden risks, and weigh them against the speed and scalability of ready-to-deploy solutions. Get expert insight into how to make the smartest long-term investment for your team’s growth.
For enterprise leaders, the build vs. buy decision is one of the most critical and challenging choices in scaling a compliance program. Compliance requirements are accelerating. Resources are stretched. And the pressure to scale fast is only growing.
That’s why so many teams are asking:
Do we build our own platform—or buy one that’s ready today?
Even for companies with the resources to build, that doesn’t always mean they should. Custom development comes with hidden costs, long timelines, and constant upkeep.
We work closely with leading enterprises navigating this exact decision. And what we’ve seen—time and again—is that the right choice depends on how fast you need to move, and how much risk you’re willing to carry.
This guide breaks down what’s at stake, so you can make the smartest investment in your compliance strategy.
Building custom compliance software might seem like the right way to stay in control. But it’s not just a technological decision—it’s a resource commitment with real financial and operational impact.
Enterprise teams often face one—or more—of these challenges:
If any of these challenges sound familiar, you’re not alone—and building a platform from scratch might not be the most efficient way forward.
Let’s take a closer look at what that path really costs.
A custom platform might seem like a smart investment—until the real costs add up.
Developer salaries. Infrastructure. Compliance experts. Supplier tooling. QA and support. Each piece adds friction, delays, and risk. And that's just to get your platform off the ground.
Even a lean internal build requires a significant upfront investment, often before a single supplier is onboarded. These aren’t “nice-to-haves.” They’re the baseline costs required to build a functional, scalable platform.
When you build in-house, you’re not just investing in software. You’re committing to a long, resource-heavy project with no guaranteed return. And once development is underway, there’s rarely an obvious off-ramp. IT teams become invested, and ongoing maintenance grows more challenging as new projects and shifting technology roadmaps take priority.